Jump to content

Os Sign O'Day for 4 Years - It's official


Nevermore

Recommended Posts

Article from Camden Chat:

http://www.camdenchat.com/2015/6/12/8770115/lets-appreciate-darren-oday

Darren O'Day isn't just another reliever who can easily be replaced. At OPACY, he is one of the most popular players, with the chant "O'Day, O'Day, O'Day, OOOOOO!!" resounding throughout the park. O's management needs to make a serious attempt to resign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think that if we are going to resign him, it has to be during the season. If he hits the market, his value will skyrocket (assuming he continues to pitch like he has). He wouldn't get Miller money, obviously. It's just a matter of how much do the Orioles value him. Get it done in season, or say goodbye to O'Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is an elite reliever. You simply cannot argue with his track record, especially since getting to Baltimore:

2012: 2.28 ERA, 0.94 WHIP

2013: 2.18 ERA, 1.00 WHIP

2014: 1.70 ERA, 0.89 WHIP

2015: 1.17 ERA, 0.73 WHIP

Dan made a brilliant move locking up O'Day for 2013-15 at a relatively cheap price (3/$9.65 mm). Unfortunately, he'll probably cost double that amount, and maybe more, the next time around, when he'll be 33-35 years old. It's going to be a tough decision whether to try to extend/re-sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is an elite reliever. You simply cannot argue with his track record, especially since getting to Baltimore:

2012: 2.28 ERA, 0.94 WHIP

2013: 2.18 ERA, 1.00 WHIP

2014: 1.70 ERA, 0.89 WHIP

2015: 1.17 ERA, 0.73 WHIP

Dan made a brilliant move locking up O'Day for 2013-15 at a relatively cheap price (3/$9.65 mm). Unfortunately, he'll probably cost double that amount, and maybe more, the next time around, when he'll be 33-35 years old. It's going to be a tough decision whether to try to extend/re-sign him.

I would do my best to extend/re-sign him, even at the risk of giving him 9+ million a year.

I know some in OH, feel that relievers are fickle and fragile.

O'Day has been strong the whole time here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would do my best to extend/re-sign him, even at the risk of giving him 9+ million a year.

I know some in OH, feel that relievers are fickle and fragile.

O'Day has been strong the whole time here.

True, but you are paying him for the future and not the past. I assume at 9 mil/year we'd have to give him at least 3 years. Are you confident he will be both productive and dominant at age 33-36? Because I am not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but you are paying him for the future and not the past. I assume at 9 mil/year we'd have to give him at least 3 years. Are you confident he will be both productive and dominant at age 33-36? Because I am not.

Yes, I know, we pay for future. My point was, he has been nothing but rock solid for us, not streaky good and then moments of bad.

In O'Day's case, I would go three years. There is a risk yes, but solid pen guys in the 2+ WAR as a reliever are not easy to come by, and you usually have to pay for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at Pat Neshek. They compare pretty well. Neshek signed a 2/13mil with a club option for another 6.5mil. He signed this deal at 34 years old. This is the low end of O'Day's market. I think if we were to offer O'Day a 3 year deal, it would have to be somewhere in the ballpark of 3/18-22 mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at Pat Neshek. They compare pretty well. Neshek signed a 2/13mil with a club option for another 6.5mil. He signed this deal at 34 years old. This is the low end of O'Day's market. I think if we were to offer O'Day a 3 year deal, it would have to be somewhere in the ballpark of 3/18-22 mil.

Nice compare with Neshek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Kind of frustrating how well Boston has played this year given expectations. And they always seem to have a good farm. 
    • With 2.5 years of control I can't believe the Marlins will shop him for dimes on the dollar. 
    • Luzardo has certainly experienced a down year compared to 2023. He has had some injuries (and currently on IL with a lumbar issue) and his statcast data is worse. The walk rate is still good but the K rate has dropped big time.  He is still missing bats but players aren’t chasing as much. I still think this is a guy that is and will be on the O’s radar, provided that they are comfortable with the medicals. They still would have him for 2 more years as well and he doesn’t turn 27 until the end of September, so you basically will have him for what are historically his peak years. Miami has said they aren’t trading him but I’m not sure I buy that. Outside of 2023, he has had his share of injury issues and he’s a big risk to acquire but he’s also a big risk to keep. The question is, what will Miami need for him to decide to move him?  Right now, his value is obviously way down. If you are Miami do you keep him and hope he gets back healthy, finishes strong and then you trade him for more  in the offseason than you likely can get now or do you cut your losses, get 70ish cents on the dollar and make sure you get something of value? If the Os were to put a deal of Norby, Stowers, Beavers, Tavera and Urias on the table for Luzardo and Nardi, would Miami turn that down?  Would they get a better offer? I think both answers to those questions are maybe. I think he’s a tough one to gauge but the team control and the fact that he is left handed is huge. Get him with our coaches and our program and on a real baseball team and things could be different for him..change of scenery type thing. I was luke warm on acquiring him before because I was worried about his health but if we can get him without trading our absolute best assets, that makes him even make intriguing. Add in getting Nardi and I think this is a package that could help the Os a lot. Its a risk and it certainly hurts some of your depth but it also opens up a door for Mayo and eventually Holliday and it keeps your absolute best prospects here.
    • I would not be surprised to see Boston finishing 2nd in the AL East this season with the Yanks 3rd
    • The O’s will play MLB games in a MiLB ballpark next year.  For those who are thinking “road trip!”, consider this about Sacramento.  While announcers were raving about the weather in Oakland this past weekend, in Sacramento July 5, 6 & 7 daily highs were 108, 110 & 106.  I would imagine day games will be limited.  
    • The Semien pick and the Holmes pick seem to be the two biggest reaches which is interesting since neither were the only rep for their team so there isn't even that logic there.  Josh Smith or Jordan Westburg should have been over Semien (I know they are both primary 3B, but either could play 2B for a couple innings) and Kimbrel of Jansen over Holmes. 
    • Must be fWAR because Westburg has 2.8 rWAR to Semien’s 2.3. And he’s only played 5 less games than Semien. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...